Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED97844

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

MAY 21, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED97844 CITY OF COOL VALLEY, RES V TERRY BROCK, APP
  1. ED98119 CHARLES CASACKKAR, APP V DES, RES
  1. ED98613 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JASON A. PARRENT, APP
  1. ED98615 JASON PARKER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98639 ROLLAN STANLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98783 BERNARD CLARDY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98816 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JIMMY RAY BELL, APP
  1. ED98834 DONALD ADAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98898 IN THE INTEREST OF: B.P.
  1. ED98922 EARL RINGO, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98942 MARVIN BUTLER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99031 DERIUS TRIPLETT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99051 CITY OF VELDA CITY, RES V. DARNEL MERIWETHER, APP
  1. ED99112 NANCY BOYER, APP V COUNTRY MEADOWS & DES, RES
  1. ED99289 IN THE INTEREST OF: D.M.J.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion