Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98132

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

APRIL 16, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98132 AARON SEARCY, APP V STATE FARM FIRE, RES
  1. ED98276 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KERRY L. WRIGHT, APP
  1. ED98314 IN THE MATTER OF: BRIAN CRAIG
  1. ED98337 CEDRIC BAKER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98445 CORNELIUS DOUGLAS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98500 KEITH KELLY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98582 IN THE MATTER OF CARE & TREATMENT JEROME BROWN APP
  1. ED98612 CLARENCE GEIGER III, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98771 BRYAN B. MCCARTY, APP V. LISA J. MCCARTY, RES
  1. ED98856 JAMEEL S. RASHEED, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98889 ANTWONE IRVING, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98992 BARRY RANDELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99219 ERIC HICKERSON, APP V. GAYE L. FIFE, ET AL., RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion