Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98294

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

JUNE 18, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98294 SCOTT ADAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98398 ERIC D. BUCKNER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98416 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. DAUDA S. KOHLHEIM, APP
  1. ED98558 QUINCELL O. CONWAY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98788 DWAYNE E. HARRIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98855 WILLIAM CRAYTON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98873 HAROLD WOLFF, APP V JUSTIN GREEN, ET AL, RES
  1. ED98874 KENNETH ARTIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98877 BRETT BUSSE, APP V SCP WORLDWIDE I L.P.,ET AL, RES
  1. ED99177 KURT PONZAR ET AL, APP V AMERICAN NAT'L ET AL, RES
  1. ED99195 ROBERT WILLIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99240 JAMES ROBINSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

CORRECTION(S):

  1. ED98209 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BRANDON BIBBS, APP

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion