Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98501

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 17, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98501 RONALD HALKMON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98696 MARQUISE ATKINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98720 N. SACAKLI, ET AL, APP V CITY ST LOUIS, ET AL, RES
  1. ED98916 JASMINE JEFFRIES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED98926 TERRENCE WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99015 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL B. FALKIN, APP
  1. ED99086 JOHN D. HAWKINS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99150 MICHELLE L. SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99170 KEVIN JAMES BUCKNER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99242 MICHAEL J. DRAKE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99305 CITY OF ST. ANN, RES V. LONNIE SNELLING, APP
  1. ED99320 LIVINGSTON FINANCIAL, RES V. JEFFREY LAGE, APP
  1. ED99437 ERONNE GARDNER, APP V ALEXIAN BROTHER & DES,

RES

  1. ED99487 TERESA M. MAURER, APP V. DEREK J. MAURER, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion