Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98512

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

OCTOBER 22, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98512 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JIMMIE M. PAMPKIN, APP
  1. ED98931 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BOBBY L. PERR, JR., APP
  1. ED99208 LEONARD C. GILLIAM, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99247 KENNETH SCHNEIDER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99304 PAMELA DUESENBERG, RES V. DAVID DUESENBERG, APP
  1. ED99448 ROSA DALIZ, APP V. T. R. HUGHES, INC., RES
  1. ED99453 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SEARL DUNN, APP
  1. ED99464 SHANNON M. HUEY, RES V. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, APP
  1. ED99498 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ERIC B. HICKERSON, APP
  1. ED99568 ROBERT A. STEBE, ET AL, RES V. GURU UNLIMITED, APP
  1. ED99574 NAREN CHAGANTI, APP V. MARTINI HAYNES, JR., RES
  1. ED99580 DEBRA O'SHEA, APP V. BRIAN GELBER, ET AL, RES
  1. ED99658 MARIO MARTINEZ, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99710 SUSAN FRANKLIN, APP V. MID AMERICA HOTEL CORP, RES
  1. ED99729 MATTHEW NDONWI, APP V MAZE BI NDONWI, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion