OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98512

Opinion

OCTOBER 22, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98512 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JIMMIE M. PAMPKIN, APP
  1. ED98931 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BOBBY L. PERR, JR., APP
  1. ED99208 LEONARD C. GILLIAM, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99247 KENNETH SCHNEIDER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99304 PAMELA DUESENBERG, RES V. DAVID DUESENBERG, APP
  1. ED99448 ROSA DALIZ, APP V. T. R. HUGHES, INC., RES
  1. ED99453 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SEARL DUNN, APP
  1. ED99464 SHANNON M. HUEY, RES V. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, APP
  1. ED99498 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ERIC B. HICKERSON, APP
  1. ED99568 ROBERT A. STEBE, ET AL, RES V. GURU UNLIMITED, APP
  1. ED99574 NAREN CHAGANTI, APP V. MARTINI HAYNES, JR., RES
  1. ED99580 DEBRA O'SHEA, APP V. BRIAN GELBER, ET AL, RES
  1. ED99658 MARIO MARTINEZ, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99710 SUSAN FRANKLIN, APP V. MID AMERICA HOTEL CORP, RES
  1. ED99729 MATTHEW NDONWI, APP V MAZE BI NDONWI, RES

Related Opinions