Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98852

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

NOVEMBER 19, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98852 STATE OF MO, RES V ERIC WRIGHT, APP
  1. ED98897 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TERRILL WESTBROOK, APP
  1. ED98921 PADBERG LAW FIRM, RES V G. MCWILLIAMS, ET AL, APP
  1. ED99017 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHYRUS WOODS, APP
  1. ED99252 TIMOTHY M. BECKER, RES V. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE,

APP

  1. ED99316 LATHAN HARRINGTON, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99330 DEWAYNE WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99397 JOE C. SWIMS III, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99441 OTIS NICHOLSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99567 ELIZABETH JORDAN, RES V. ST. JOHN'S MERCY, APP
  1. ED99576 WILLIAM S. WEITZEL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99639 MICHAEL W. MATHEWS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99822 DOMINIC MAXWELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99882 ARTOSKA GILLISPIE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion