OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED98852

Opinion

NOVEMBER 19, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED98852 STATE OF MO, RES V ERIC WRIGHT, APP
  1. ED98897 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TERRILL WESTBROOK, APP
  1. ED98921 PADBERG LAW FIRM, RES V G. MCWILLIAMS, ET AL, APP
  1. ED99017 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHYRUS WOODS, APP
  1. ED99252 TIMOTHY M. BECKER, RES V. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE,

APP

  1. ED99316 LATHAN HARRINGTON, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99330 DEWAYNE WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99397 JOE C. SWIMS III, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99441 OTIS NICHOLSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99567 ELIZABETH JORDAN, RES V. ST. JOHN'S MERCY, APP
  1. ED99576 WILLIAM S. WEITZEL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99639 MICHAEL W. MATHEWS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99822 DOMINIC MAXWELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99882 ARTOSKA GILLISPIE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions