OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99070

Opinion

DECEMBER 17, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99070 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEFFERY D. LOTTIE, APP
  1. ED99189 SAMIR MEHIC, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99197 OLIVER JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99210 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ARTHUR JONES, APP
  1. ED99216 BRANDON GEIGER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99244 M. SANCHEZ-DIAZ, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99346 JUDY E. HAIR, APP V. PETER L. DESHOTEL, RES
  1. ED99680 IN THE INTEREST OF: J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C., R.D.C.
  1. ED99709 SUREN CHAGANTI, MD, APP V. FIRST BANK. ET AL, RES
  1. ED99762 PAMELA JACKSON, APP V ST. ELIZABETHS & DES, RES
  1. ED99814 THOMAS J. KLUTHO, APP V. THE COMPANY CORP., RES
  1. ED99855 ANTOIN JOHNSON, APP V MERS/MO GOODWILL & DES, RES
  1. ED99906 ANDRE WILLIAMS, SR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100031 TYLER KELSEY, RES V. LOY-LANGE BOX CO., APP
  1. ED100048 ANTONIO J. GILL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100129 TONY EDMOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions