Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99070

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

DECEMBER 17, 2013

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99070 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEFFERY D. LOTTIE, APP
  1. ED99189 SAMIR MEHIC, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99197 OLIVER JOHNSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99210 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ARTHUR JONES, APP
  1. ED99216 BRANDON GEIGER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99244 M. SANCHEZ-DIAZ, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99346 JUDY E. HAIR, APP V. PETER L. DESHOTEL, RES
  1. ED99680 IN THE INTEREST OF: J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C., R.D.C.
  1. ED99709 SUREN CHAGANTI, MD, APP V. FIRST BANK. ET AL, RES
  1. ED99762 PAMELA JACKSON, APP V ST. ELIZABETHS & DES, RES
  1. ED99814 THOMAS J. KLUTHO, APP V. THE COMPANY CORP., RES
  1. ED99855 ANTOIN JOHNSON, APP V MERS/MO GOODWILL & DES, RES
  1. ED99906 ANDRE WILLIAMS, SR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100031 TYLER KELSEY, RES V. LOY-LANGE BOX CO., APP
  1. ED100048 ANTONIO J. GILL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100129 TONY EDMOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion