Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99239

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar insurance bad faith issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

MARCH 11, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99239 GENE RADEMACHER, APP V JANET RADEMACHER ET

AL, RES

  1. ED99518 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DEMETRIUS HULSEY, APP
  1. ED99721 RICARDO A. CUEVAS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99751 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICKY LANE, APP
  1. ED99765 KEVIN MCDAVIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99838 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SAMIE JAY LOUIS, APP
  1. ED99844 ALFRED WEAVER, APP V MIDAMERICA HOTELS & DES,

RES

  1. ED99864 LATRAIL R. YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99921 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD LYNCH, APP
  1. ED99922 L. SMITH, RES V. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INS CO, APP

MARCH 11, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED100034 MICHAEL J. BOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100077 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JERRY L. DYE, APP
  1. ED100250 MULIJA KADRIC, APP V. CENTAUR BLDG & SIF, RES
  1. ED100268 TERRELL WEST, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100630 STATE OF MISSOURI, APP V GERMAINE MOREHOUSE,

RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion