OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99239

Opinion

MARCH 11, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99239 GENE RADEMACHER, APP V JANET RADEMACHER ET

AL, RES

  1. ED99518 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DEMETRIUS HULSEY, APP
  1. ED99721 RICARDO A. CUEVAS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99751 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICKY LANE, APP
  1. ED99765 KEVIN MCDAVIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99838 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SAMIE JAY LOUIS, APP
  1. ED99844 ALFRED WEAVER, APP V MIDAMERICA HOTELS & DES,

RES

  1. ED99864 LATRAIL R. YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99921 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD LYNCH, APP
  1. ED99922 L. SMITH, RES V. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INS CO, APP

MARCH 11, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED100034 MICHAEL J. BOND, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100077 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JERRY L. DYE, APP
  1. ED100250 MULIJA KADRIC, APP V. CENTAUR BLDG & SIF, RES
  1. ED100268 TERRELL WEST, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100630 STATE OF MISSOURI, APP V GERMAINE MOREHOUSE,

RES

Related Opinions