OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99241

Opinion

FEBRUARY 11, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99241 ROY HANDLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99286 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KENITH WILSON, APP
  1. ED99308 CHARLES A. LANDERS. APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99314 DORCINO JACKSON, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99558 GREGORY WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99625 ANDREW WALTERS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99732 KIM COBB, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99776 SANDRA KING, APP V. RHONDA FECH, ET AL, RES
  1. ED99798 RONALD D. WRIGHT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99799 BRANDON MCKINNEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

FERUARY 11, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99801 IN MATTER OF CARE AND TREATMENT OF FRED PECK,

APP

  1. ED99817 ORLANDO HADLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99873 D. DRUGER, APP V. JEFF. CITY COCA COLA & DES, RES
  1. ED99920 DIONE L. SCHWARTZ, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED99974 ERIC A. PRITCHETT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100000 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LECRESIA BELCHER, APP
  1. ED100166 MICHELLE BELT, RES V. ST. JOHN'S, APP & SIF, RES

Related Opinions