Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99781

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 23, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99781 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHAWN THOMAS, APP
  1. ED99870 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL K. MOSLEY, APP
  1. ED99919 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ARVIS MILLER, APP
  1. ED100135 TIMOTHY FRIEDMANN, RES V. DAWN FRIEDMANN, APP
  1. ED100253 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. JEFFERY RICHARDSON,

APP

  1. ED100279 TONIA STONER, RES V TODD STONER, APP
  1. ED100300 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARLOS TRAVIS, APP
  1. ED100347 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TERRON POOL, APP
  1. ED100353 ANTHONY E. SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100603 CHRISTOPHER GILLESPIE APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI

RES

SEPTEMBER 23, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED100610 JONATHAN SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED100747 COCKRIEL & CHRISTOFFERSON RES V JAMES BOWLIN

APP

  1. ED100853 ERIC HECKMAN, APP V DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, RES
  1. ED101162 IN THE INTEREST OF: J.L.N.
  1. ED101252 KEVIN CHILDERS, APP V CUSTOMER DIRECT & DES, RES
  1. ED101392 JAMES BRIGHT, APP V JOHN MOLLENKAMP, RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion