OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED99982

Opinion

DECEMBER 15, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED99982 DIANNA MARIE SCHILF RES V RICHARD ALLEN SCHILF

APP

  1. ED102094 WILLIAM STILES, RES V. CIR. CT. DIV. 1, ETAL, APP
  1. ED102201 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLETTA TOWNSEND, APP
  1. ED102222 M.A.F, RES V D.R.F., III, APP
  1. ED102347 JOHNNIE MOORE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102444 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KARLOS D. CULBERSON,

APP

  1. ED102520 THOMAS BROOKS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102612 JOSHUA ARSENEAU, RES V DEVON ARSENEAU, APP
  1. ED102617 ARTEZ UPCHURCH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102626 IN THE INTEREST OF: C.Y.

DECEMBER 15, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED102659 CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, RES V MARGARET JENKS TST,

APP

  1. ED102677 DONALD A. MAUL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED102821 WHITE KNIGHT LIMO APP V BREEZE COACH LEASING

RES

CORRECTION(S):

  1. ED102925 CHRISTINE SIMMONS, RES V HUBELL KILLARK ELEC,

APP

Related Opinions