Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Rodney Martin, Appellant/Respondent, v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Disposition

Mixed outcome

  • {"type":"affirmed","scope":null}
  • {"type":"dismissed","scope":null}

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Rodney Martin, Appellant/Respondent, v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Respondent. Case Number: 54436 Handdown Date: 03/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Cole County, Hon. Byron L. Kinder Counsel for Appellant: Rodney Martin Counsel for Respondent: Jeremiah Nixon Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Lowenstein, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant escaped from a residential treatment center of the Department of Corrections. His bank account with the Department was deemed abandoned and confiscated. Appellant's petition was dismissed. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16 (b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion