Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Sonia Smith, Appellant, v. St. Charles County (Wentzville) R-IV School District, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Sonia Smith

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar employment law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Sonia Smith, Appellant, v. St. Charles County (Wentzville) R-IV School District, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. Case Number: No. 71910 Handdown Date: 07/15/1997 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Counsel for Appellant: Anne c. Juhasz Counsel for Respondent: Alan J. Downs Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, P.J., Reinhard and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, Sonia Smith, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Appeals Tribunal wherein it found appellant had voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to work or respondent, St. Charles County (Wentzville) R-IV School District. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the Commission's decision was supported by sufficient and competent evidence, was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion