State of Missouri, ex rel. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, and Gateway Western Railway Company, Relators, v. The Honorable Michael David, Circuit Judge, Division I, Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis
Decision date: UnknownED82696
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, ex rel. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, and Gateway Western Railway Company, Relators, v. The Honorable Michael David, Circuit Judge, Division I, Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis Case Number: ED82696 Handdown Date: 05/06/2003 Appeal From: Writ of Prohibition Counsel for Appellant: Paul Brown and Anthony Franks Counsel for Respondent: Kevin Hoerner Opinion Summary: Relators, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Gateway Western Railway Company ("Relators"), filed a petition for a writ of prohibition directing Respondent to transfer venue of the underlying case, Cause No. 022-00148, to Saline County, Missouri. PRELIMINARY ORDER MADE PERMANENT. Writ Division Two Holds: Because Respondent failed to file an answer to the petition as directed, he is in default and Relator is entitled to judgment for the relief demanded in the petition. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence G. Crahan, Judge Opinion Vote: PRELIMINARY ORDER MADE PERMANENT . Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Norton, J., concur Opinion: Relators, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Gateway Western Railway Company ("Relators"), filed a petition for a writ of prohibition directing Respondent to transfer venue of the underlying case, Cause No. 022-00148, to
Saline County, Missouri. After reviewing the suggestions filed in support and in opposition, we issued our preliminary writ directing Respondent to file his answer to the petition on or before April 11, 2003, stating that a failure to do so would result in a judgment by default against him for the relief demanded in the petition. The preliminary order further directed Respondent to take no action in the underlying matter until further notice. Respondent did not file an answer to the petition on or before April 11, 2003. Accordingly, we find Respondent to be in default and enter judgment making permanent the preliminary order in prohibition. State ex rel Hayes v. Forder, 973 S.W.2d 555, 556 (Mo. App. 1998). (FN1) Respondent is directed to transfer Cause No. 022-00148 to the Circuit Court of Saline County. Footnotes: FN1. Although we resolve this case based on Respondent's default, we reject Respondent's contention in his suggestions in opposition that he had the discretion to deny Relator's motion based on the Plaintiff's reply, which was filed well after the ten days allowed for a reply by Rule 51.045(b). Once that period expired, Respondent had no discretion to deny the motion and his duty to grant it became purely ministerial. See State ex rel. Vee-Jay Contracting Co. v. Neill , 89 S.W.3d 470, 472 (Mo. banc 2002).
Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
A.L.O., Respondent, vs. G.L.N., Appellant.(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 10, 2024#ED112141
Linda G. Runnels, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 23, 2024#ED111645