State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis Williams, Appellant. Dennis Williams, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis Williams, Appellant. Dennis Williams, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 68999 and 71921 Handdown Date: 03/10/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Irene Karns and Judith LaRose Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Catherine Chatman Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant, Dennis Williams, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. As to the direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). As to the post-conviction appeal, the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.