OTT LAW

Steven R. Bornhop, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Michelle M. Bornhop, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Steven R. Bornhop, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Michelle M. Bornhop, Respondent. Case Number: 72997 Handdown Date: 09/22/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Frank A. Conard Counsel for Appellant: Michael A. Turken Counsel for Respondent: Michael P. Shea Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, C.J., Karohl, J. and Crist, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop's (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. VonSande, 858 S.W.2d 233, 236 (Mo. App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions