Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Theresa Breeden, et al., Respondents, v. Hogan Transports, Inc.

Decision date: UnknownED85731

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Hogan Transports, Inc.
Respondent
Theresa Breeden, et al.

Disposition

Dismissed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Theresa Breeden, et al., Respondents, v. Hogan Transports, Inc. Case Number: ED85731 Handdown Date: 11/15/2005 Appeal From: Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, Hon. Michael David Counsel for Appellant: Christopher Allen Counsel for Respondent: Roger Rea Opinion Summary: Withdrawn. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence E. Mooney, Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Crane, P.J., and Shaw, J., concur. Opinion: Withdrawn. See opinion order dated February 21, 2006 Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830

remanded

The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Call About This ClaimAsk About This Claim
Read The Medical Malpractice GuideGuide
Personal Injurymajority12,101 words
Read opinion