Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

1123 Washington Avenue Retail Condo, LLC, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
1123-washington-avenue-retail-condo-llc-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving 1123 Washington Avenue Retail Condo, LLC, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Property owners within the Downtown St. Louis Community Improvement District appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment, which barred their claim seeking refunds for special assessments. The property owners argued they were not collaterally estopped from challenging the assessments as unlawful taxes under the Refund Statute. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment, concluding that the property owners' claim was time-barred by the more specific statute of limitations in the CID Act, rather than the general Refund Statute.