Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

6 Clayton Terrace, LLC, and Jeannette R. Huey, Trustee of the Jane R. Huey Lifetime Trust Agreement Dated May 21, 1998, Appellants/Cross- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
6-clayton-terrace-llc-and-jeannette-r-huey-trustee-of-the-jane-r-huey-lifetime-trust-agreement-dated-may-21-1998-appellants/cross
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving 6 Clayton Terrace, LLC, and Jeannette R. Huey, Trustee of the Jane R. Huey Lifetime Trust Agreement Dated May 21, 1998, Appellants/Cross-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Jeannette R. Huey and 6 Clayton Terrace, LLC, appealed portions of a circuit court judgment concerning the sale and proposed subdivision of a lot in Clayton Terrace Subdivision, and the Trustees cross-appealed. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's ruling that Ms. Huey's sale of her home was valid, finding she complied with the right of first refusal. The Court also affirmed that the subdivision's "one residence per lot" indenture provision is valid and prohibits lot subdivision, but reversed the circuit court's finding that the trustees abused process and consequently reversed all awards of attorney's fees.