Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Aaron Barker Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
aaron-barker
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Criminal Law ConsultationCall About A Criminal Law Claim

Cases Involving Aaron Barker

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 30, 2024

Aaron Barker vs. Missouri Department of Corrections, Et Al.

Appellant

Aaron Barker appealed the grant of judgment on the pleadings in his declaratory judgment action against the Missouri Department of Corrections and the State of Missouri. Barker sought jail-time credit for a period he was on parole for one consecutive sentence while awaiting sentencing on another. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, holding that Section 558.031.1(1) prohibits applying jail-time credit for the same period to two consecutive sentences, even if one credit was for time on parole.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation