Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Aaron Russell Roesch Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
aaron-russell-roesch
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Aaron Russell Roesch

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Aaron Roesch sued Brittany Sheffer and Peace, Love, Sold, LLC, seeking to enforce an oral agreement for the sale of real property through a constructive trust. Roesch alleged Sheffer agreed to purchase a property for his benefit and then sell it to him, but later demanded a significantly higher price. The trial court dismissed Roesch's petition, citing the statute of frauds and failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, holding that Roesch failed to adequately plead a constructive trust claim because he did not allege Sheffer accepted his tendered payment, which is necessary to establish unjust enrichment.