Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ACADEMY I, LP, JOHN DOE, and NYADIA BURDEN Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
academy-i-lp-john-doe-and-nyadia-burden
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving ACADEMY I, LP, JOHN DOE, and NYADIA BURDEN

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Appellants, the family of a man killed by Luis Perez, sued Academy I, LP, a gun store, and its employee John Doe, alleging negligent entrustment and negligence per se for selling ammunition to Perez. The circuit court dismissed the claims. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, holding that Appellants failed to allege facts showing Academy knew or should have known of Perez's incompetence or intent to harm for the negligent entrustment claim. The court further held that federal criminal statutes could not serve as the basis for a negligence per se claim in state court due to the express preclusion of private rights of action by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).