St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ACLU OF MISSOURI and LUZ MARIA HENRIQUEZ Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
aclu-of-missouri-and-luz-maria-henriquez
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving ACLU OF MISSOURI and LUZ MARIA HENRIQUEZ

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

ACLU of Missouri and Luz Maria Henriquez appealed the dismissal of their Sunshine Law petition against the Maries County Sheriff's Office. The trial court dismissed the petition without prejudice, finding the Sheriff's Office was not an entity that could sue or be sued, and denied leave to amend the petition to name the Sheriff. The appellate court vacated the judgment and remanded with instructions, holding that the trial court abused its discretion by denying leave to amend without a justifying reason, especially since the proposed amendment would relate back and the Sheriff had notice of the action.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation