St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ADAM BINGHAM and IDA BINGHAM Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
adam-bingham-and-ida-bingham
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationReal Estate

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving ADAM BINGHAM and IDA BINGHAM

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Adam and Ida Bingham challenged property liens filed by Phelps County Public Water Supply District #4 for unpaid sewer charges, arguing the charges were unauthorized taxes under the Hancock Amendment. The circuit court found the charges did not violate the Hancock Amendment, denying the Binghams' claim for attorney's fees. On appeal, the Southern District affirmed, holding that the sewer charges were user fees, not unauthorized taxes, because they were tied to the use of the service by connected properties and disconnection was possible.

Real EstateCivil Litigation