Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ADAM BINGHAM and IDA BINGHAM, Plaintiffs- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
adam-bingham-and-ida-bingham-plaintiffs
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving ADAM BINGHAM and IDA BINGHAM, Plaintiffs-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Adam and Ida Bingham sued Phelps County Public Water Supply District #4, challenging a lien on their property and alleging the District's charges were an unauthorized tax under the Hancock Amendment. The trial court declared the lien void but declined to rule on the Hancock Amendment issue, which the Binghams argued was necessary for an award of attorneys' fees. The appellate court vacated the judgment and remanded the case, instructing the trial court to rule on the merits of the Hancock Amendment claim to determine the Binghams' entitlement to attorneys' fees and expenses.