This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
adrian-s-doolin
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Adrian Doolin appealed the denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea for sexual misconduct in the first degree. He claimed his plea was induced by erroneous advice from his counsel that he would never have to register as a sex offender, resulting in manifest injustice. The appellate court affirmed the denial, first establishing jurisdiction over the post-sentencing misdemeanor motion. It then found that Doolin failed to prove his counsel made such an assurance, and the advice given at the time regarding registration requirements was accurate, thus no manifest injustice occurred.