Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Alexander Cooper Komes Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
alexander-cooper-komes
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Alexander Cooper Komes

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

Alexander Cooper Komes, Appellant, v. Jason Joseph Grote, Respondent.

Appellant

Alexander Komes appealed the judgment dissolving his four-year marriage to Jason Grote, challenging the trial court's division of marital property and debt. The trial court awarded Grote 87% of marital assets, including two homes and a dog, and assigned him 100% of mortgage debt and 95% of credit card debt. The appellate court affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion, as the property division was supported by Grote's pre-marital contributions and Komes' marital misconduct, and the debt division was equitable.