Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Alisa Warren, The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Scott Gustafson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
alisa-warren-the-missouri-commission-on-human-rights-and-scott-gustafson
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Alisa Warren, The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Scott Gustafson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Bi-State Development Agency appealed the dismissal of its petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition and de novo judicial review. Bi-State sought to compel the Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR) to withdraw a right-to-sue letter issued to Scott Gustafson, arguing the MCHR lacked jurisdiction or failed to abide by a prior settlement agreement. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, holding that under Section 213.111.1, RSMo, the MCHR is mandated to issue a right-to-sue letter and terminate proceedings once 180 days have passed and a request is made, regardless of unresolved jurisdictional or settlement issues.