Missouri Case Party

Alvin L. Hunter Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: alvin-l-hunter
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Criminal Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Alvin L. Hunter

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 4, 2021

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Alvin L. Hunter, Appellant.

Appellant

Alvin L. Hunter appealed his convictions for seven counts of forcible rape and six counts of forcible sodomy following a bench trial. Hunter challenged the trial court's interpretation of the relevant statutes regarding voluntary intoxication, the sufficiency of the State's evidence on force and timeframe, the denial of his motion to dismiss, and the admissibility of video evidence. The Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment on all points.

Criminal Law Civil Litigation