Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Amanda Everett Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
amanda-everett
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Amanda Everett

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 12, 2023

Amanda Everett vs. Valerie Vance and Beverley Vance

Appellant

Amanda Everett sued Valerie Vance and Beverley Vance, seeking to set aside a prior consent judgment and garnishment orders, alleging they were fraudulently procured by Valerie Vance. The circuit court vacated the prior judgment, enjoined Valerie Vance, and awarded Everett damages. On appeal, the Court of Appeals dismissed Beverley Vance's appeal for lack of standing because claims against her were voluntarily dismissed before judgment. The court affirmed the judgment against Valerie Vance, rejecting her arguments regarding personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and the trial court's authority to entertain an independent action for fraud.