Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri and Sara E. Baker Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
american-civil-liberties-union-of-missouri-and-sara-e-baker
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri and Sara E. Baker

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

The American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri appealed the dismissal of its petition, which sought to compel the Secretary of State to approve a referendum petition sample sheet. The Secretary of State had rejected the sample sheet on constitutional grounds, asserting the underlying act was ineligible for referendum due to an emergency clause. The appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment, holding that the Secretary of State's authority at the pre-signature collection stage is limited to reviewing the sample sheet for "sufficiency as to form" as defined by statute, not constitutional compliance. The court entered judgment compelling the Secretary of State to approve the sample sheet and proceed with the referendum process.