St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
american-honda-motor-co-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCorporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Ed Napleton St. Louis Imports, Inc. appealed the Administrative Hearing Commission's (AHC) decision denying its request for an increased warranty parts reimbursement rate from American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Napleton argued the AHC misapplied Section 407.828 of the Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act (MVFPA) regarding the determination of "fair and reasonable compensation" for warranty parts. The appellate court affirmed the AHC's decision, holding that the AHC correctly interpreted "prevailing amount" and reasonably found Napleton's requested markup rate to be excessive compared to the market.

Criminal LawCorporate Law