St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Andrew Bailey, In His Official Capacity Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
andrew-bailey-in-his-official-capacity
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Real Estate ConsultationCall About A Real Estate Claim

Cases Involving Andrew Bailey, In His Official Capacity

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Dr. Anna Fitz-James filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Attorney General Andrew Bailey to approve fiscal note summaries for 11 proposed initiative petitions. The Attorney General had refused, asserting the summaries were deficient in legal content by underestimating costs. The circuit court made its writ of mandamus permanent, ordering the Attorney General to approve the summaries. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the Attorney General's review authority under section 116.175 is limited to the legal content and form as defined in subsection 3, not the substantive fiscal impact, and that mandamus was an appropriate remedy for this ministerial duty.

Real EstateCivil Litigation