This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
andrew-bullard
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Andrew Bullard, convicted of child molestation, appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He claimed ineffective assistance of counsel regarding delayed jury instructions and the State's use of his Google search for an attorney as evidence of consciousness of guilt. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, finding that trial counsel's actions were reasonable trial strategy and that Bullard failed to demonstrate prejudice.
Andrew Bullard appealed his conviction for first-degree child molestation, arguing three points of error by the trial court. He contended the court erred by admitting testimony about photographs found on his phone, refusing testimony about the victim's father's reputation for violence, and overruling an objection to the State's closing argument. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no abuse of discretion in the evidentiary rulings and no plain error in the closing argument.