St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ANDREW HALSEY and TAMMY KENNEDY Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
andrew-halsey-and-tammy-kennedy
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Workers' Compensation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Workers' CompensationCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving ANDREW HALSEY and TAMMY KENNEDY

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Andrew Halsey and Tammy Kennedy appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's award, which found their son's death was a compensable injury by accident under workers' compensation law. The parents argued the Commission erred in finding an "accident" and in its application of the "idiopathic causes" exception, specifically regarding the burden of proof and the causal link of obesity. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's award, finding sufficient evidence for the "accident" and concluding that while the Commission erred on the burden of proof for idiopathic causes, the parents failed to meet their burden of production to show "but for" causation for obesity.

Workers' CompensationCivil Litigation