Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ANGELA KAY FURTADO, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
angela-kay-furtado-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving ANGELA KAY FURTADO, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Date unavailable

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANGELA KAY FURTADO, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Angela Kay Furtado appealed her convictions for first-degree burglary, third-degree assault, and resisting arrest following a jury trial. She challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain her conviction for resisting arrest and alleged plain error in a jury instruction for the burglary charge. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding sufficient evidence that officers intended to arrest Furtado and that she knew or should have known of the arrest attempt. The court also found no plain error in the burglary instruction, as it followed the applicable MAI-CR and Furtado was separately convicted of assault.