Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Anthony West Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
anthony-west
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Anthony West

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 17, 2018

State of Missouri vs. Anthony West

Respondent

Anthony West was charged with involuntary manslaughter after a semi-truck accident. The trial court granted West's motion to suppress evidence from the truck's electronic control module (ECM), finding he had standing to challenge the warrantless search and that no warrant exceptions applied. The appellate court affirmed, holding that West had standing based on a trespassory search under United States v. Jones, and that the State failed to establish the automobile or exigent circumstances exceptions.