Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 26, 2021
Missouri Case Party
Antoine L. Ellis Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
- Party ID
- antoine-l-ellis
- Cases Shown
- 2
- Top Practice Route
- Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Legal Help From The Archive
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Cases Involving Antoine L. Ellis
Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.
Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable
Antoine L. Ellis vs. State of Missouri
Antoine L. Ellis appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, asserting ineffective assistance of trial counsel for advising him not to testify. The motion court denied the motion after an evidentiary hearing, finding counsel's advice was strategic and Ellis failed to prove prejudice. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that Ellis did not demonstrate prejudice under Strickland v. Washington because his alternative suspect defense was already presented to the jury, and there was overwhelming evidence of his guilt.