Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Aramark Uniform Services, Inc., and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Second Injury Fund Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
aramark-uniform-services-inc-and-treasurer-of-the-state-of-missouri-second-injury-fund
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Aramark Uniform Services, Inc., and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Second Injury Fund

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

James Schlereth appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's denial of his claim for permanent total disability against Aramark Uniform Services, Inc. and the Second Injury Fund. Schlereth contended the Commission erred in denying his claim because its findings did not support the award and were not supported by sufficient competent evidence, specifically regarding causation of his tinnitus. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's award, finding that while the Commission's statement of "no evidence" of causation was erroneous, there was sufficient competent evidence to support the ultimate finding that the work-related accident was not the prevailing factor in causing Schlereth's tinnitus.