Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 8, 2010
Missouri Case Party
Archdiocese of St. Louis, et al. Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
- Party ID
- archdiocese-of-st-louis-et-al
- Cases Shown
- 2
- Top Practice Route
- Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Legal Help From The Archive
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Cases Involving Archdiocese of St. Louis, et al.
Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.
Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable
John J.P. Doe, Appellant, v. Archdiocese of St. Louis, et al., Respondents.
John Doe appealed the grant of summary judgment in favor of Father Alexander Anderson and the Archdiocese of St. Louis on his claims of childhood sexual abuse and intentional failure to supervise clergy. The trial court had ruled that Doe lacked standing because his cause of action was property of his bankruptcy estate. The appellate court reversed, holding that Doe's cause of action accrued when he recovered his memory of the abuse, which occurred after his bankruptcy filings, thus granting him standing to pursue his claims.