Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Attorney General and Commissioner of Administration Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
attorney-general-and-commissioner-of-administration
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Attorney General and Commissioner of Administration

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 9, 2021

Lisa Wilson vs. Attorney General and Commissioner of Administration

Respondent

Lisa Wilson, whose father died after being struck by a Metrolink train, obtained a wrongful death judgment against the train operator, Flernoy, with an agreement to execute only against the State Legal Expense Fund (SLEF). Wilson then filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that Flernoy, as an employee of the Bi-State Development Agency, was covered by the SLEF. The circuit court granted summary judgment for the State, finding Bi-State is not a state agency. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that Bi-State is an interstate compact entity, not an agency of the State of Missouri, and therefore the SLEF is not available to satisfy the judgment.