Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Benjamin Equestrian Center, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
benjamin-equestrian-center-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Benjamin Equestrian Center, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 26, 2019

Heather Rosales vs. Benjamin Equestrian Center, LLC

Respondent

Heather Rosales was injured at Benjamin Equestrian Center's horserace track when a horse reared up and fell on her. She sued Benjamin for negligence, and a jury found in her favor. On appeal, Benjamin argued that it was immune under the Equine Activities Liability Act and that Rosales's claim was barred by the implied primary assumption of risk doctrine. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that Benjamin's negligence enhanced the inherent risks of equine activity, thus negating its statutory immunity and precluding the application of the assumption of risk doctrine.