Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Betty Lou Williams and Kim Bauman Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
betty-lou-williams-and-kim-bauman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Betty Lou Williams and Kim Bauman

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

The Andrew County Public Administrator, acting as conservator for Virgil D. Williams, appealed the denial of her request to divide an Edward Jones investment account held as tenants by the entireties with Virgil's wife, Betty L. Williams. Virgil died prior to the appeal's argument and submission. The appellate court dismissed the appeal as moot, holding that Virgil's death terminated his ownership interest in the account and the conservator's authority, rendering any decision on the merits without practical effect. The court also dismissed a third point on appeal for lack of a discernible argument and an insufficient record.