Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
blh-development-company-llc-et-al-defendants
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Robert S. Whitmore, as trustee for Nancy Billow, sued BLH Development Company, LLC, Tri-Lakes Escrow, Inc., and Branson Landing Hotel, LLC, seeking the return of an escrow deposit for a condominium purchase. The claims included violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and fraudulent transfer. The trial court found in favor of all defendants. On appeal, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no error in the trial court's procedural rulings and its determination that the appellant failed to properly raise or preserve various claims.