Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BOBBY J. CARTER, Petitioner- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
bobby-j-carter-petitioner
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving BOBBY J. CARTER, Petitioner-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Bobby J. Carter appealed the dismissal of his petition for review of the suspension of his driving privileges by the Director of Revenue (DOR). Carter's commercial and base driving privileges were suspended after a DWI arrest. He argued that the trial court erred in dismissing his petition because the DOR's notice was conflicting and denied his due process rights, asserting a conflict between statutory appeal deadlines. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, holding that the 15-day appeal period from the mailing of the administrative decision is controlling and that the DOR's notice was not misleading regarding the different deadlines for commercial and base driving privileges.