Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Brad and Christine Francis Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
brad-and-christine-francis
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Employment ConsultationCall About A Employment Claim

Cases Involving Brad and Christine Francis

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 6, 2021

Brad and Christine Francis vs. Director of Revenue

Appellant

Brad and Christine Francis appealed a decision by the Administrative Hearing Commission, which found them liable for state income tax, additions, and interest for the years 2013-2015. The Francises argued that the Commission lacked authority, that they had no taxable income under federal law, and that certain exhibits were improperly admitted. The Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the Commission's decision, rejecting all of the Francises' arguments as meritless or unnecessary to review.

Employment LawCivil Litigation