Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Brenda Dumler, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
brenda-dumler-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Brenda Dumler, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 2, 2019

Brenda Dumler, et al vs. The Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

Appellant

Brenda Dumler sued Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, to quiet title to her property and for slander of title, alleging Nationstar refused to release an invalid deed of trust. The circuit court ruled in Dumler's favor, quieting title and awarding damages for slander of title. On appeal, Nationstar argued the actions were time-barred and the slander of title judgment lacked substantial evidence. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding Nationstar's appeal on quiet title was procedurally flawed, the slander of title claim was not time-barred due to a continuing wrong, and there was substantial evidence of publication, malice, and pecuniary loss. The case was remanded solely for the circuit court to determine appellate attorneys' fees.