This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
brian-keith-heathcock
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Brian Keith Heathcock appealed his Warren County conviction for first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle, arguing it violated his double jeopardy rights because he had already pled guilty to tampering with the same vehicle on the same date in Montgomery County. The Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the tampering conviction and vacated its sentence. The court held that the successive prosecutions for unlawfully operating the same vehicle constituted multiple punishments for the same offense, violating the Double Jeopardy Clause, and that the State failed to prove a separate tampering offense in Warren County due to a lack of independent corroborating evidence. His convictions for resisting arrest and attempted victim tampering were affirmed as unchallenged.