Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BRIAN L. MCDANIEL Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
brian-l-mcdaniel
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving BRIAN L. MCDANIEL

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Aug 5, 2020

BRIAN L. MCDANIEL, Appellant vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Appellant

Brian L. McDaniel appealed the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion, which sought to set aside his first-degree murder conviction. The motion court had found McDaniel was abandoned by counsel and treated his initial PCR motion as timely, then denied relief on the merits. The appellate court vacated the motion court's judgment, holding that McDaniel's initial PCR motion was untimely filed over nine years after the direct appeal mandate, and neither the abandonment exception nor the third-party interference exception applied to excuse the late filing. The case was remanded with directions to dismiss both the initial and amended PCR motions as untimely.