Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BRIAUNA RAEANNA COLLINS Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
briauna-raeanna-collins
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving BRIAUNA RAEANNA COLLINS

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 6, 2022

BRIAUNA RAEANNA COLLINS, Respondent vs. DAVID JOE BANNISTER, JR., Appellant

Respondent

David Joe Bannister, Jr. appealed from amended judgments of full orders of protection. During the underlying hearing, the sound recording equipment malfunctioned, preventing the creation of a transcript for appellate review. The appellate court reversed the trial court's judgments and remanded the case for a new trial, holding that an appealing party is entitled to a full transcript and a new trial is the appropriate remedy when the record is inadequate through no fault of the parties.